
When homeowners compare a heat pump to a gas HVAC system, the question is usually practical: what’s the cost difference, and is it big enough to change the decision?
The most useful way to start is with the median. The median reflects the 50th percentile of real completed replacements—the center of the market—so it isn’t pulled around by the cheapest projects or the highest outliers.
Across California, the statewide median replacement cost for a split system heat pump was $17,831.50. For a split system gas system, the statewide median was $16,459.
That puts the statewide gap at $1,372.50, or about 8.34% higher for heat pumps. That difference is measurable, but it’s not dramatic—and it doesn’t behave the same way everywhere in the state.
Statewide data gives you orientation. It answers one clean question: in the middle of the California market, how far apart are heat pumps and gas systems?
That’s a useful anchor. But it’s not a complete prediction for your home, because replacements don’t cluster on a single line—they spread out around that center.
Here’s the “middle band” where many completed replacements land:
Those bands overlap significantly. That overlap matters because it tells you something simple: system category alone doesn’t determine final cost. The center of the market is different statewide, but there’s still plenty of room for a gas system to land above many heat pump projects (and vice versa).
If you want broader statewide trend context, see our Are Central AC and Furnace Replacement Costs Rising in California in 2026?.
The statewide gap exists for a simple reason: the two categories aren’t identical, and homeowners don’t buy them the same way.
Heat pumps are often installed at higher efficiency tiers, and configuration choices can change the final number. Even within the same subtype, completed projects differ meaningfully in:
There’s also a market‑level factor most homeowners don’t think about until they see pricing in the real world: how the company is built. Overhead, staffing models, marketing investment, and operational scale vary widely across contractors. Those structural differences can shift where a completed replacement lands—even when the system category is the same and the installation meets the same baseline standards.
The useful takeaway isn’t “one factor explains everything.” It’s that your outcome depends on system spec, home conditions, and local market structure—not just a label that says “heat pump” or “gas.”
Here’s a simple mental model that keeps the data clear:
This prevents the two mistakes homeowners make most often: relying on a single statewide number as if it’s a personal quote, or ignoring statewide perspective and assuming every local number is universally true.
Statewide medians give perspective. Regional medians give clarity. Below are regional medians for split system heat pumps and split system gas replacements, plus example cities in each region with links to local benchmarks.
Example cities: San Jose, Oakland, Walnut Creek, Santa Rosa. In the Bay Area, the two system types are essentially aligned at the median. That means cost alone is less likely to decide the direction.
Example cities: Sacramento, Elk Grove, Rocklin, Woodland. Here, heat pumps trend moderately higher than gas in the center of the market. The gap is noticeable, but it’s still in the manageable category for many households—especially when you keep the statewide middle band in mind and compare like‑for‑like equipment tiers.
Example cities: Fresno, Bakersfield, Stockton, Modesto. This region shows the largest separation. If you live here, the equipment tier and system capacity you choose can have an outsized effect on where you land relative to the middle of the market.
Example cities: Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario, Temecula. Here, heat pumps land below gas at the median. The statewide average does not reflect the local pattern—this is exactly why local benchmarks matter.
Example cities: Irvine, Anaheim, Huntington Beach, San Clemente. Orange County mirrors the Inland Empire pattern, with heat pumps aligned with or below gas in the center of the market.
The most common assumption is that heat pumps automatically cost significantly more. The regional breakdown shows that isn’t universally true. In multiple regions, heat pumps are comparable to—or below—gas at the median.
Even within a single subtype, pricing spans a broad range—because completed replacements reflect different homes, different system specifications, and different installation environments.
One practical way to use this: if you’re looking at a number well above the upper end of the middle band, it’s usually being driven by higher system spec, higher complexity, or a higher‑cost delivery model. If you’re well below the lower end, it’s often a smaller system, a simpler install environment, or a lower‑cost delivery model.
The median anchors expectations. The band tells you what normal variation looks like.
If you skip everything else, here’s the outcome:
The practical move heading into 2026 isn’t to rely on assumptions about “premiums.” Use the statewide baseline for perspective, then use your city’s benchmarks to get specific. When you do that, the decision stops feeling like a guessing game—and starts feeling like a controlled, informed choice.